Unified Framework Update

The 10⁻⁵ signal scale, logarithmic pressure response and 50% peak at 7.83 Hz are prescribed. The pressure score is not a solved chameleon thin shell.

The released scalar–Maxwell example does not implement matter-density screening or an atomic force observable. That mapping requires its own public derivation and calibration.

Calculated from explicit assumptions; no atom-interferometry measurements.

Use a factorial design rather than changing noise and coupling together. Report loss power in watts; −P_loss is a score, not dimensionless efficiency.

This driven, dissipative circuit protocol is distinct from the closed, undamped scalar–Maxwell browser model. Phase order and scalar field amplitude are not identified.

Protocol only; no new experimental observations or fabricated results.

The stated inputs give 1.1964228939 N, not 0.84 N. Asymmetry enters as A − 1/A; the implemented ΔC dependence is linear. The old target interval is not a current validated uncertainty interval.

The released model has no calibrated payload, mechanical thrust observable or map from cosmological x_m to local matter coupling. Net propulsion additionally requires a momentum and boundary-flux analysis.

Arithmetic from assumed inputs; not a calibrated thrust measurement.

CPL density uses exp(−3wₐz/(1+z)). The displayed k,C₀→w₀,wₐ map is a chosen parameterization. A B(C)F² term alone does not establish n=1+2βC or the advertised lensing multiplier.

The released example uses B(φ)=exp(gφ), a polynomial potential and a flat periodic 2+1 reduction. It is not a full metric evolution, screening model or SI calibration of the broader proposal.

Conditional mathematics and numerical reference curves, not a cosmological fit.

The continuity-equation sign is corrected in both H(z) and distance. The historical benchmark button and curve use the same w₀, wₐ and H₀; the benchmark is explicitly not a new fit.

CPL is a phenomenological cosmology model, not the released flat-space electromagnetic solver. No identification of cosmology parameters with g, k=1.92 or the k≈1.549 simulation lead is supplied.

Numerical integration with declared parameters; no likelihood evaluation or new MCMC.

The current example removes the reversed interpolation grid and invalid-distance clamp. H follows the Friedmann constraint, not a relaxation rule; the Klein–Gordon equation includes d ln H/dN.

This is a standard, separately defined cosmology example—not a reproduction of historical MCMC pipelines, the complete framework, or the released fixed-metric scalar–Maxwell model.

Runnable public example and synthetic checks; no live posterior or observational feed.

The formula now displays the 10⁻²⁰ normalization used by the historical implementation. This factor is an assumption, not a measured efficiency. A cosmological parameter fit alone is not an engineering feasibility test.

A separate mapping from a field solution to an apparatus, coupling, boundary conditions and momentum exchange is required. The released solver does not supply this normalization.

Conditional arithmetic, not demonstrated propulsion or validated apparatus.

The propulsion branch shares the current force implementation. The collagen quantity is an energy/thermal ratio; treating it as a transport Péclet number requires additional dynamical assumptions and measurements.

Reusing k, x_m or a coherence label does not establish a mapping between cosmology, cellular transport and a field amplitude. Biological or therapeutic conclusions do not follow from these calculators.

Calculated force and energy/thermal proxies; not cross-scale experimental validation.

Model time now enters the update. The unused k-fit label is not presented as an active parameter. Export contains recorded samples; the paired sweep actually changes the pulse condition and uses controlled seeds.

C=1−H is a defined order score, not the released model’s φ. Response gain is not power or thermodynamic efficiency. The separate k≈1.549 lead is neither fitted nor tested here.

Actual recorded synthetic steps, not instrument telemetry or measured energy.

Inputs are labeled synthetic. Output is a cumulative dimensionless score, not watts or thrust. The reused 0.026 coefficient is dimensionless here, not a lattice spacing. Downloads identify themselves as simulation configurations.

Each device needs its own physical model, energy/momentum budget, SI calibration and experiment. The released scalar–Maxwell example does not establish vacuum-energy extraction, reactionless lift or therapeutic action.

Simulated inputs and calculated indices only; no live solar, magnetic or heart data.